Philip Henning vs Adhithya Ganesan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Ganesan has a slight advantage with 44.85% of second serve points won compared to Henning's 44.6% in recent form. Is this minor difference enough to influence the match outcome?
• Return Game Stats: Ganesan exhibits stronger return skills, winning 48.14% of opponent’s second serve points, while Henning has 43.33%. For first serve returns, Ganesan maintains an edge with 32.45% over Henning's 26.43%.
• Under Pressure: Both players show similar abilities under pressure, but Ganesan marginally outperforms Henning by saving 56.74% of breakpoints as opposed to Henning's 56.12%.
• Performance Overview: Over the past year, Henning narrowly surpasses Ganesan with a win rate of 63.79% versus 62.5%. Does this slight edge indicate a trend in Henning's favor?
• Best Surface: Henning is dominant on Hard surfaces, winning 78% of matches, while Ganesan is less commanding with a 60% win rate on the same surface. Should this give Henning confidence playing on Hard?
• Player Level: Henning excels in Futures/ITF tournaments with an 83.33% win rate compared to Ganesan's 63.64%, suggesting superior performance at lower-level events.
• Opponent Quality: Ganesan has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 128.29, whereas Henning's opponents average rank is 368.43.
• Deciding Set Performance: In tight matches, Ganesan could have the upper hand, winning 59% of deciding sets, while Henning has won only 40% in the past year.
• Break Point Conversion: Ganesan converts break points at 38.28%, which is more effective than Henning's 30.33%, critical for pressure situations.

Editorial Prediction (July 6, 2025, UTC):

Henning and Ganesan present a closely matched contest, with both exhibiting similar strengths and minor differences in key performance areas. Ganesan's modest advantage in second serve performance and superior return game poise suggests a slight edge over Henning.

Though Henning's dominant performance on Hard courts and recent tournament successes at lower levels signal potential advantages, Ganesan's ability to convert break points and handle decisive situations might become pivotal.

In conclusion, while both players have competitive stats, Ganesan's experience against higher-ranked opponents and heightened performance in deciding sets position him as the more likely winner in this upcoming tennis match.